The (Liberal) First Amendment

There are two versions of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:

1. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


And then there's the Liberal's version of the Amendment:

2. Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of ourspeech, or of the press associated with us; or the right of the people we choose to allow peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Only those who agree with our opinions (people, the press and otherwise) will be allowed any true 'freedom of speech' without our interference.


The screams (of protest) the second version will be little surprise, as neither will be the vicious slander (of myself) that I am certain is to follow my choosing to ignore the protests. I can imagine I will be called all sorts of terrible things, and I will be attacked from every angle. I have seen it happen on too many blogs, in too many networks, to think I might be given anything else.

Conservatives are not always a prize package... I will not deny that... but at least we are willing to admit that some of our members (even some of our leaders, perhaps!) are not everything we want them to be. That they do not hold up to the standards we set - that they are hypocritical.

Democrats are known for hypocrisy. The blinders they have on must be immense, and how they can see any part of reality is something I wonder all the time. They attack their opponents for things they themselves do, and then when brought to the question, they attack again, or lie, even when faced with irrefutable proof they are lying.

For example, we have Al Gore, the self-styled 'inventor of the Internet'. The man is a joke, as pretty much everyone who will be reading this knows very well already. His own opinion of himself far outweighs any real capability on his part.

To give an example I have used many times before - we have his unwillingness to fly on a commercial airplane, instead choosing to use a gas-guzzling private jet. How can we learn from your example, Mister Gore, when you create such a quantity of (as you call them) 'greenhouse gasses' crossing the country on a private jet because you're too snide to fly in pubic (with Secret Service agents)?

And what of Mrs. Clinton and the matter of licenses for illegal immigrants? She did a fine job of tripping over her own tounge several weeks ago when she had to cover her butt because her support for Spitzer backfired in her face. Hillary is, as I have heard said in several articles, a typical Liberal, trying to have it 'both ways', as it were, and to have the support of all sides.

Truth no longer matters to Liberals, as shown by their relation to the First Amendment of our constitution. As I have said before, the Amendment is only fitting to theirstandard, and anyone who dissagrees with them is not allowed its protection, as far as they are concerned.

Under other circumstances I'd make a sarcastic comment here, but the circumstances are such that it would not be appropriate, because their behavior is what the world expects from them - indignancy and arrogance. Truth is not one-sided... unless you're a Democrat.