To come on to a completely different subject than the one I've discussed so many times in the past... I go to child sexual abuse and the support it seems to receive in various ways throughout our nation.
Paraphrasing a book I once read, the game with these animals is all about euphemism. For example, do you know the actual definition of the term 'pedophile'? There is a reason, you see, that child molesters and the members of NAMBLA (The Nat’l American Man-Boy Love Assoc.), a group that I will discuss later or at another time) use that term.
'Pedophile' means, simply enough, 'lover of children', when translated from its original Latin, and it does not mean 'love' in the sense that the child molester puts it. Also, something said by NAMBLA associates, is to call their actions 'intergenerational love'. It's enough to make you want to throw up.
The only way that someone who puts their hands (sexually) on a child 'loves' that child is the same way they'd 'love' a nice house or car, or a good meal. They love the feeling it creates in them - one of pleasure. To these, children are nothing more than a toy or an object. Something to be used and/or played with, then thrown in to the trash when the user has no more interest in it.
From what I understand, NAMBLA has made available (on any number of occasions) information about how a man could 'find his way' to 'love a little boy' as he chooses to. Of course, they're careful to make sure that they don't give any ways to do it in this nation (and if they've ever done that, they've done their best not to be obvious about it), but they make it easy for their associate molesters (I will not refer to them as pedophiles' - that is their word, as I said earlier) to get what they want.
Of course, any member of that organization would call me a 'fascist', or use some similar term, and say, "You're denying these children their right to do as they will!"
They're children. There's a reason there's a charge called statutory rape, and it’s because the kids in primary question (I would say generally, at most, in their early teens, if even that old…) here have no concept of what saying ‘yes’ means. They are not, despite the beliefs of NAMBLA, capable of understanding of what these acts will do to their bodies, or their minds.
Also, we find sometimes NAMBLA and its associates trying to throw in with the homo- and bi-sexual crowds. I can tell you from conversations I’ve had with friends of both orientations that as far as they’re concerned, child molesters have nothing to do with their beliefs. Molesting a child is a crime, they say to me, and I agree wholeheartedly.
I conclude with this statement: I hear people all the time talking about how the “abuser needs help.” What about the victim?
07 June 2007
Enough...
The President has not taken in to enough consideration the consequences of this so-called amnesty bill. Not only would it create a rather sizable block of new liberal voters, further unbalancing our two-party system, but it would also put a sizable strain on a welfare system that most of these people are probably already using with false social security numbers.
According to Ann Coulter, whites were a 2/3 majority in the U.S. Not to be racist, but, by 2050, we're going to be a significant minority, if the number of immigrants continues to increase.
Something else that is not taken in to consideration, from what I can see, is that doing this will create a significant number of people who suddenly have to be paid at the minumum wage, which a lot of businesses in this country are not going to like - even the Unions, who claim to be anti-illegal immigrant use illegal labor for their construction rather than their associates (as I myslef saw recently, near where I work). This will encourage attempts to try to continue illegal immigration, as businesses try to replace their 'cheap labor'.
Some immigrants may even attempt to remain illegal, since even a lot of people who are legal citizens in this counry are convinced we're living in a police state. An associate of mine (a black gentleman I have known for a very, very long time, more than 20 years) has told me about any number of other blacks he knows, to give an example, who refuse to get EZ-Pass - an item used on the East Coast to get through toll booths to and from bridges, tunnels and roadways more rapidly. They seem to think that the government is monitoring where they're going (and when) if they use EZ-Pass.
What they don't seem to understand is that even if you wait that extra 20 minutes (or however long or short you're there for), your face and license plate are photographed the moment you come in to the toll booth. If the government wanted to know where you were, they'd know already, so stop with the conspiracy theories already. They're getting very tiring.
But there is something even more important than that - another reason we should be more careful about immigration - the reason I believe our borders should be under heavy guard. We have terrorists using our 'open borders' to come in to the country illegally.
Illegal labor is one thing. Getting blown to bits is something else entirely. I like being in one piece (and breathing), so we need to start being more careful, if not because of the damage that illegal labor does to our economy (and will continue to do, likely no matter what), but because our lives are in danger because of madmen we seem to welcome with open arms, whether they come to the U.S. with permission or not.
According to Ann Coulter, whites were a 2/3 majority in the U.S. Not to be racist, but, by 2050, we're going to be a significant minority, if the number of immigrants continues to increase.
Something else that is not taken in to consideration, from what I can see, is that doing this will create a significant number of people who suddenly have to be paid at the minumum wage, which a lot of businesses in this country are not going to like - even the Unions, who claim to be anti-illegal immigrant use illegal labor for their construction rather than their associates (as I myslef saw recently, near where I work). This will encourage attempts to try to continue illegal immigration, as businesses try to replace their 'cheap labor'.
Some immigrants may even attempt to remain illegal, since even a lot of people who are legal citizens in this counry are convinced we're living in a police state. An associate of mine (a black gentleman I have known for a very, very long time, more than 20 years) has told me about any number of other blacks he knows, to give an example, who refuse to get EZ-Pass - an item used on the East Coast to get through toll booths to and from bridges, tunnels and roadways more rapidly. They seem to think that the government is monitoring where they're going (and when) if they use EZ-Pass.
What they don't seem to understand is that even if you wait that extra 20 minutes (or however long or short you're there for), your face and license plate are photographed the moment you come in to the toll booth. If the government wanted to know where you were, they'd know already, so stop with the conspiracy theories already. They're getting very tiring.
But there is something even more important than that - another reason we should be more careful about immigration - the reason I believe our borders should be under heavy guard. We have terrorists using our 'open borders' to come in to the country illegally.
Illegal labor is one thing. Getting blown to bits is something else entirely. I like being in one piece (and breathing), so we need to start being more careful, if not because of the damage that illegal labor does to our economy (and will continue to do, likely no matter what), but because our lives are in danger because of madmen we seem to welcome with open arms, whether they come to the U.S. with permission or not.
Only In Vermont
A woman was arrested at some point within the past few days for one of the most rediculous reasons I've ever heard, and it's something that could ONLY have happened in the Northeastern United States.
She was making faces at a police dog.
They claim she was distracting the dog from its duties by doing so - she had a pretty high BAC (approximately .21), but they attempted to charge her with animal cruelty.
For making faces at a dog.
I think there are reasonable limits, folks, and we just passed one of them. Her behavior was perhaps, not appropriate, but there is no reason for charging her with what they attempted to (the 'cruelty' charge didn't go through). From what I know of them, dogs are not stupid animals, and a police dog... well, a police dog I would have expected to have been trained to ignore distractions from the duties it had been trained to do.
I think perhaps if they're afraid a dog could be distracted by someone sticking their tounge out at it (or something of that sort) we need to work on our animal training for the Vermont Police Department.
She was making faces at a police dog.
They claim she was distracting the dog from its duties by doing so - she had a pretty high BAC (approximately .21), but they attempted to charge her with animal cruelty.
For making faces at a dog.
I think there are reasonable limits, folks, and we just passed one of them. Her behavior was perhaps, not appropriate, but there is no reason for charging her with what they attempted to (the 'cruelty' charge didn't go through). From what I know of them, dogs are not stupid animals, and a police dog... well, a police dog I would have expected to have been trained to ignore distractions from the duties it had been trained to do.
I think perhaps if they're afraid a dog could be distracted by someone sticking their tounge out at it (or something of that sort) we need to work on our animal training for the Vermont Police Department.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)