Definitions

To come on to a completely different subject than the one I've discussed so many times in the past... I go to child sexual abuse and the support it seems to receive in various ways throughout our nation.

Paraphrasing a book I once read, the game with these animals is all about euphemism. For example, do you know the actual definition of the term 'pedophile'? There is a reason, you see, that child molesters and the members of NAMBLA (The Nat’l American Man-Boy Love Assoc.), a group that I will discuss later or at another time) use that term.

'Pedophile' means, simply enough, 'lover of children', when translated from its original Latin, and it does not mean 'love' in the sense that the child molester puts it. Also, something said by NAMBLA associates, is to call their actions 'intergenerational love'. It's enough to make you want to throw up.

The only way that someone who puts their hands (sexually) on a child 'loves' that child is the same way they'd 'love' a nice house or car, or a good meal. They love the feeling it creates in them - one of pleasure. To these, children are nothing more than a toy or an object. Something to be used and/or played with, then thrown in to the trash when the user has no more interest in it.

From what I understand, NAMBLA has made available (on any number of occasions) information about how a man could 'find his way' to 'love a little boy' as he chooses to. Of course, they're careful to make sure that they don't give any ways to do it in this nation (and if they've ever done that, they've done their best not to be obvious about it), but they make it easy for their associate molesters (I will not refer to them as pedophiles' - that is their word, as I said earlier) to get what they want.

Of course, any member of that organization would call me a 'fascist', or use some similar term, and say, "You're denying these children their right to do as they will!"

They're children. There's a reason there's a charge called statutory rape, and it’s because the kids in primary question (I would say generally, at most, in their early teens, if even that old…) here have no concept of what saying ‘yes’ means. They are not, despite the beliefs of NAMBLA, capable of understanding of what these acts will do to their bodies, or their minds.

Also, we find sometimes NAMBLA and its associates trying to throw in with the homo- and bi-sexual crowds. I can tell you from conversations I’ve had with friends of both orientations that as far as they’re concerned, child molesters have nothing to do with their beliefs. Molesting a child is a crime, they say to me, and I agree wholeheartedly.
I conclude with this statement: I hear people all the time talking about how the “abuser needs help.” What about the victim?